On September 15, 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a decision in Ex parte Lebovich reversing the Examiner’s rejection of claims directed to a packaged
A “product-by-process” limitation exists where a recited product, such as a composition or article, is defined in terms of the method used to manufacture the product.
The term “comprising,” when used in the preamble of a claim, permits the inclusion of other elements or materials in addition to those specified in the
A prima facie obviousness rejection combining multiple disclosures requires a reason to modify or combine the prior art to achieve the claimed invention with a reasonable
For a prior art reference to be properly used in an obviousness rejection, the reference must be analogous art to the claimed invention. In re Bigio, 381
When considering the obviousness of ranges, it is a fundamental principle of U.S. patent law that “where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior
On July 14, 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision in Ex parte Park (Appeal 2019-006050) in which a rejection over an overlapping prior art
On August 19, 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) issued a decision in Ex parte Boutillier (Appeal No. 2020-000348) reversing an Examiner’s obviousness rejection
On July 31, 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) issued a decision in Ex parte Marco (Appeal No. 2020-000873) reversing an Examiner’s rejection for